My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad

Evolution Weblogs Of Note

Daubert Expert Resources

Evolution Web Resources

  • Afarensis
    reality based humanoid's blog
  • Origin of Species Online
    For God's sake, read the dang thing before you proclaim any thoughts on evolution!! Now it's online at your fingertips. Go. Read. Then, pontificate if you must.
  • Talk Origins
    The master site containing the most comprehensive of evolution and anti-evolution sites and information on the web. A model example of how to really teach the controversy.

Junk Science Sites

Religous Critiques of Intelligent Design

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

« Preacher Mike's Conspiracy | Main | Intelligent Design proves God Picked NC to win »

Comments

John P Stewart

I want to ask how evolution theory is tested? What experiment can be repeated? And what falsifying data could be found to disprove it? And does Evolution theory claim to be absolutely certain?


I ask because I am being taught that a Science attempts to apply some of the following criteria:

1) Skepticism of unsupported claims

2) Combination of an open mind with critical thinking

3) Attempts to repeat experimental results.

4) Requires testability

5) Seeks out falsifying data that would disprove a hypothesis

6) Uses descriptive language

7) Performs controlled experiments

8) Self-correcting

9) Relies on evidence and reason

10) Makes no claim for absolute or certain knowledge

11) Produces useful knowledge


Bring past theologians, is that using the Argumentum ad numerum?

James

1. Skepticism is fairly evident no matter what is presented.
2. You have to learn the facts and come to your own conclusions. Don't accept evolution because anyone says to, logic it out.
3. Fossil sequences, genetics, and embryology to name a few.
4. part of 3.
5. Potential falsification would be rabbits in the Cambrian. Many others exist.
6. read any science journal
7. read any science journal
8. Has evolution changed it's description over the years? (YES!!)
9. see any series of science journals
10. Agreed.
11. Medicine, AI, crops, genetic engineering.

Ralph H I Davies

You're quite right John, it should cover all your points but fails horribly. I consider it the greatest scientific con in history.

The comments to this entry are closed.