The Discovery Institute, explains the "Difference Between Teaching Criticisms of Evolution and Teaching Intelligent design" subtitled "Critical Analysis of Evolution is not the same as teaching Intelligent Design."
That "explanation" qualifies for two "whopper" awards.
Panda's Thumb explains why there is, in fact, no difference whatsoever between "criticisms of evolution" and "Intelligent Design" but you knew that already.
ID advocates are in bizarro world when they claim to be "defenders of science." But, let's take them at their word. Here's the challenge. Since the DI does not favor teaching Intelligent Design in schools and does favor teaching evolution, what does their proposed evolution syllabus look like?
Paleontology, Geology, Radiocarbon dating, genetic sequencing, DNA, cellular evolution?...all check?
Somehow I doubt that the DI really advocated the teaching of any part of evolution. But I could be wrong. Well DI, we're waiting. Tell us how you would teach evolution.