My Photo
Blog powered by TypePad

Evolution Weblogs Of Note

  • ERV
    Evolution's secret weapon--research backed by wit.
  • Pseudo Science Blog
    What's that BPSDB logo all about?
  • The Loom
    Carl Zimmer frames the discussion.
  • Bad Astronomer
    Explainer of atronomy to the masses and almost as popular as PZ.
  • Science and Evolution
    Science and Evolution, decoded.
  • Exploring Our Matrix
    Butler University Religion Professor Explores
  • Church Burning Ebola Boys
    How can you go wrong with a kickass name like that? Check out (and contribute) to the Tard quotes.
  • Angry Astronomer
    Angry? Yes, for good reason. But thoughtful, witty and great photographs.
  • Right Wing Techno Pagan
    creationism opposed by all shades of the political spectrum
  • Check Six
    Evolution amid the flotsam and jetsam of the mind
  • Respectful Insolence (Orac knows)
    M.D. seeks insolent facts, discussing science, medicine and psedoscience and medicine-- a lot to talk about.
  • Stranger Fruit
    ASU Biologist's well named blog
  • Pharyngula
    A biologist specializing in zebrafish. What soes this have to do with Evolutuion? Oh, nearly everything.
  • Evolution Blog
    Blog by founder of Multiple Designer Theory, perhaps evolving into a great chessplayer
  • The Panda's Thumb
    Scholarly site with multiple contributors. Most have also published books debunking Intellgient design and Creationism. High level science background recommended

Daubert Expert Resources

Evolution Web Resources

  • Afarensis
    reality based humanoid's blog
  • Origin of Species Online
    For God's sake, read the dang thing before you proclaim any thoughts on evolution!! Now it's online at your fingertips. Go. Read. Then, pontificate if you must.
  • Talk Origins
    The master site containing the most comprehensive of evolution and anti-evolution sites and information on the web. A model example of how to really teach the controversy.

Junk Science Sites

Religous Critiques of Intelligent Design

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Links to here

« February 2008 | Main

It appears that both Evolution and Intelligent Design are wrong

I recieved an open letter to the NCSE proving that both evolution and Intelligent Design are wrong.  Who knew?  The letter speaks for itself:

An Open Letter to the National Center for Science Education:

The platform of Creation Science is "flood geology" (based upon the flood of Noah in 2611 BC), and that Adam & Eve were created on the Sixth Day of Creation Week, less than 10,000 years ago. The platform of Biblical Reality is "Moses Didn't Write About Creation", which is actually saying that "Moses wrote about Restoration".
The doctrine of Biblical Reality is that God showed Moses six different days which occurred in the past, with each day being taken from a different week, and each week being the first week in seven different geologic eras of mankind. Each day was a different day of the week, with the days of revelation being shown to Moses starting with Sunday, on a Sunday. But chronologically, the earliest vision starts with Wednesday, the only day of Creation Week which Moses was shown. These six visions were given to Moses while he was on Mt. Sinai, in 1598 BC, about six weeks after crossing the Red Sea, in "biblical order".
The opposing view of evolution is not "Creation". I get tired of hearing and reading about people that say that. That is an indication of ignorance of the facts. There are no "creation accounts" in Genesis. The correct opposing view is the "six days of Moses", or what I have coined as the "Observations of Moses". Starting chronologically, the "Fourth Day" was Wednesday of Creation Week, shown to Moses on a Wednesday, representing the first geologic era of mankind, comparable to the Pre-Cambrian/Paleozoic Eras. The death of species occurred by escalation, starting with small life forms in the water. This era ended with the Great Extinction, in 245 Million BC. This is when Lucifer lost "the war in Heaven", and caused the death of all surface life that he could. What followed was the first of six restorations of life on Earth, as defined by God Himself, conveyed by means of the remaining six days of Moses.
The "fifth day" of Moses was a Thursday, shown to Moses on a Thursday, taken from the first week of the Mesozoic Era, where Moses saw "sea monsters" (not great whales, as the King James' misquotes) and ancient birds created. The era ended with the most popular extinction, in 65 Million BC, with the death of the dinosaurs.
The "sixth day" of Moses was a Friday, of the second restoration week of Earth, the first week of the Cenozoic Era. This is the period of the large mammals, and the first biblical mentioning of (prehistoric) mankind. Mankind was created during Creation Week, but for the first time in Earth's history, mankind was restored "in God's image", unlike mankind had been previously made before.
Each period of restoration followed an extinction, after an unknown interval. The end of the recent Ice Age was the sixth extinction, and Adam & Eve were the seventh dispatch of mankind, created in about 7200 BC.
Keep this in mind whenever you hear or see something written about creationism or evolution. The book "Moses Didn't Write About Creation!", which is now in print, explains each 24-hr day that God revealed to Moses. ISBN-10:1424182204, PublishAmerica.com.
I make the declaration that the theory of evolution, which the NCSE supports, is FALSE, and I welcome an open public debate on the issue. You are supporting humanist dogma, and not truth in education!  Don't waste your time or efforts with any other "creationist" entity, such as "Discovery Institute", "Institute of Creation Research", "Reasons to Believe", or any other such organization. What they support is also false, and is a misrepresentation of the Word of God. If you want to challenge the Bible, direct your efforts toward me, and not those others, who are neither authorized, nor qualified to teach on Genesis.
Start promoting the teaching of truth, and not atheism and insanity in our public schools.  There is now another more plausible explanation for the ancient history of life forms on planet Earth.
H.C.

Intelligent Design: unclear on the Peer Review concept

ID peer reviewed article published.

This is not peer reviewed science

No ned to read the article.  This is a philosophy article from the Jonathan Wtt, Logan Gage "aesthetic Intelligent Design" school of philosophy.  Not even good philosophy and certainly not even science.

If this is the best ID can do, it's dead.