Law Evolution Science and Junk Science: Intelligent Design: unclear on the Peer Review concept

About

Blog powered by Typepad

Evolution Weblogs Of Note

ERV
Evolution's secret weapon--research backed by wit.
Pseudo Science Blog
What's that BPSDB logo all about?
The Loom
Carl Zimmer frames the discussion.
Bad Astronomer
Explainer of atronomy to the masses and almost as popular as PZ.
Science and Evolution
Science and Evolution, decoded.
Exploring Our Matrix
Butler University Religion Professor Explores
Church Burning Ebola Boys
How can you go wrong with a kickass name like that? Check out (and contribute) to the Tard quotes.
Angry Astronomer
Angry? Yes, for good reason. But thoughtful, witty and great photographs.
Right Wing Techno Pagan
creationism opposed by all shades of the political spectrum
Check Six
Evolution amid the flotsam and jetsam of the mind

Daubert Expert Resources

Evolution Web Resources

Afarensis
reality based humanoid's blog
Origin of Species Online
For God's sake, read the dang thing before you proclaim any thoughts on evolution!! Now it's online at your fingertips. Go. Read. Then, pontificate if you must.
Talk Origins
The master site containing the most comprehensive of evolution and anti-evolution sites and information on the web. A model example of how to really teach the controversy.

Junk Science Sites

The Quack Files
Exposing quackery--neverending job.
Skeptic News
Get your skeptic news here, folks.
Ann's Anti Quackery and Science Blog
Ann has great stuff

Religous Critiques of Intelligent Design

Christianity Today
critique of ID rhetoric
Denis Lamoureaux
Criticism of Phillip Johnsons theology
Bruce Gordon
Candid acknowledgment of ID's hijacking by political movements
Dembski: Is ID a form of Natural Theology?
Yes, proving Dembski is just as poor theologically as he is in complexity
Dembski challenges "Mainstream" theologians
Dembski explains ID to theologians just as convincingly as he explained it to science--seems to be outside the mainstream in any field of expertise.
Edward Oakes First Things
Edward Oakes critiques Johnson in leading Catholic Theological Journal
Theological Objections to ID
Christian Carl Drews objects to ID on theological grounds
Internet Monk
Internet Monk explains why he rejects Young Earth Creationism as bad theology
Buckingham Inquirer
Resonable reflections in a Jesuit tradition
John Haught/Dembski in Science & Theology
John Haught crosses swords with Dembski on ID's theological deficiencies

Links to here

Links to here
Who links to me?

Cloud

View blog top tags

« A Thing of Beauty. | Main | It appears that both Evolution and Intelligent Design are wrong »

Intelligent Design: unclear on the Peer Review concept

ID peer reviewed article published.

This is not peer reviewed science

No ned to read the article. This is a philosophy article from the Jonathan Wtt, Logan Gage "aesthetic Intelligent Design" school of philosophy. Not even good philosophy and certainly not even science.

If this is the best ID can do, it's dead.

March 04, 2008 in BPSDB, Intelligent Design for Beginners, Junk Science | Permalink

Tags: biology, BPSDB, education, Intelligent design, philosophy, pseudoscience, science

Comments

This is hilarious how the Discovery Institute gives such a blatantly deceitful spin to things - as usual. I notice that the peer reviewed article is published in a philosophy journal that is published by - hello! - the Evangelical Philosophical Society! In other words, yet again, ID is religion, not science. Yes, thanks Discovery Institute, but we already knew that.

Posted by: SteveG | May 06, 2008 at 06:36 PM

very amazing how people invent such things :)

Posted by: online writing | May 12, 2011 at 08:27 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.

Law Evolution Science and Junk Science

Weblog exploring Intelligent Design, other pseudo sciences, junk science and the abuse of science in law, generally.